The challenge

Rapid AI adoption outpaces policy — creating data exposure, shadow tooling, and unclear accountability.

Our approach

  1. Map approved AI tools, sensitive data flows, and shadow integrations across teams.
  2. Rank AI-related exposure by data leakage risk and exploitability, not tool adoption speed.
  3. Deploy practical guardrails and monitoring hooks teams can sustain without blocking delivery.

Outcomes

  • Visibility into AI tooling and sensitive data flows
  • Risk-based guardrails for approved AI use
  • Practical controls teams can adopt without blocking innovation

Discuss AI Exposure Derisk

How we integrate with your stack

We work with your existing investments in exposure management, assessment, and security analytics to govern AI adoption with evidence, not policy decks alone.

  • Endpoint and cloud visibility

    • Correlate endpoint and identity signals with approved AI tooling scope
    • Support shadow-AI discovery conversations with operational telemetry
    • Align detection priorities with data-flow and access risks from new AI services
  • Exposure analytics and prioritization

    • Prioritize AI-related infrastructure and integration exposure
    • Track remediation progress against measurable risk reduction
    • Feed executive reporting with exploitability-focused findings
  • Continuous assessment and policy alignment

    • Map misconfigurations on systems supporting models and AI pipelines
    • Connect cloud and on-prem exposure to AI governance decisions
    • Maintain a single prioritized backlog across programs

Representative engagements

  • Technology

    Approved AI stack and data-flow guardrails

    A SaaS provider accelerated Copilot and LLM adoption across engineering and GTM teams. We mapped sensitive data flows, defined approved tooling, and aligned technical controls with product delivery timelines.

    • Documented data boundaries for customer PII in AI workflows
    • Reduced shadow-AI sprawl with clear allow lists and monitoring hooks
    • Executive-ready risk register tied to remediation owners
  • Professional services

    Shadow-AI discovery and governance uplift

    A distributed professional services firm lacked visibility into generative AI use in client-facing teams. We ran a structured discover, prioritize, and remediate cycle using the customer's existing security platforms.

    • Inventory of AI tools and integrations with risk tiering
    • Practical guardrails adopted without blocking billable work
    • Board-appropriate summary of residual exposure and next steps

Next step

Ready to discuss AI Exposure Derisk?

Share your priorities and we will respond with a practical next step — scoped to your environment, not a generic pitch.

Get in touch